Lunding v. Tax Appeals Tribunal 91 N.Y.2d 985, 674 N.Y.S.2d 276, 697 N.E.2d 177

91 N.Y.2d 985 • 674 N.Y.S.2d 276 • 697 N.E.2d 177

[697 NE2d 177, 674 NYS2d 276]

In the Matter of Christopher H. Lunding et al., Respondents, v Tax Appeals Tribunal of the State of New York, Respondent, and Commissioner of Taxation and Finance of the State of New York, Appellant.

Submitted April 29, 1998;

decided May 7, 1998

*987APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General, Albany (Andrew D. Bing of counsel), for appellant.

Christopher H. Lunding, respondent pro se, and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, New York City, for Christopher H. Lunding and another, respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Upon reargument, following remand by the Supreme Court of the United States, judgment affirmed, with costs (Matter of Lunding v Tax Appeals Tribunal, — US —, 118 S Ct 766).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley.

Lunding v. Tax Appeals Tribunal
91 N.Y.2d 985 • 674 N.Y.S.2d 276 • 697 N.E.2d 177

Case Details

Name
Lunding v. Tax Appeals Tribunal
Decision Date
May 7, 1998
Citations

91 N.Y.2d 985

674 N.Y.S.2d 276

697 N.E.2d 177

Jurisdiction
New York
Court
New York Court of Appeals

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!