6 Ohio Law Abs. 484

MATRE v. MATRE et.

Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist., Hamilton Co.

No. 3150.

Decided Mar. 5, 1928.

Thos. L. Michie, Judson A. Shuey, and Albert R. Hoffman, Cincinnati, for plaintiff in error.

Franks & Franks, and Gardner, Freking & Overbade, Cincinnati, for defendant in error.

FULL TEXT.

PER CURIAM.

Under the facts of this case, to grant the relief sought would, in effect, require the adoption of a rule of community interest of the husband and wife in personal property. Such a doctrine is unknown to the Ohio law.

The separate findings of fact by the trial court are sustained by the evidence, and the conclusion of law, based on those findings, is correct.'

The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.

(Hamilton, PJ., Mills and Cushing, JJ., concur.)

Matre v. Matre
6 Ohio Law Abs. 484

Case Details

Name
Matre v. Matre
Decision Date
Mar 5, 1928
Citations

6 Ohio Law Abs. 484

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!