Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Derrick Anthony Sardin raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Beydoun, 469 F.3d 102, 108 (5th Cir.2006), which held that there is no Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) violation when hearsay testimony is used at sentencing, rather than at trial. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
249 F. App'x 378
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Derrick Anthony SARDIN, also known as Xavier James Sardin, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10411
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 3, 2007.
Alan M. Buie, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
James Warren St. John, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
*379Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Sardin
249 F. App'x 378
Case Details
249 F. App'x 378
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!