4 B.T.A. 1075

GEORGE W. HAIGHT, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Docket No. 6141.

Decided September 27, 1926.

W. G. Mather, Esq., for the petitioner.

George E. Adams, Esq., for the respondent.

*1076OPINION.

MoRRis:

Since we have found as a fact that the earnings of the wife were separate and apart from that of the husband, it follows that in accordance with our opinion in the Appeal of Estate of George W. Randall, 4 B. T. A. 679, the determination of a deficiency against the petitioner is in error.

Judgment for the petitioner.

Haight v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 1075

Case Details

Name
Haight v. Commissioner
Decision Date
Sep 27, 1926
Citations

4 B.T.A. 1075

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!