21 Ohio St. 3d 15

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo.

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo (1986), 21 Ohio St. 3d 15.]

(D.D. No. 85-24

Decided January 2, 1986.)

*17Angelo J. Gagliardo, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.

Paul H. Hentemann and Donald J. Huffman, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s findings that Russo violated DR 6-101(A)(3); 7-101(A)(l), (2) and (3); 7-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 9-102(A) and (B); and 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6).

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that Russo be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo
21 Ohio St. 3d 15

Case Details

Name
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo
Decision Date
Jan 2, 1986
Citations

21 Ohio St. 3d 15

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!