25 Ala. App. 636 140 So. 925

140 So. 925

Benton HARRIS and Reeder Bishop v. STATE.

6 Div. 129, 130.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 19, 1932.

Rehearing Denied March 1, 1932.

Ernest B. Fite, of Hamilton, and H. H. Hamilton, of Russellville, for appellants.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

Defendants were convicted of manufacturing whisky. The sole question presented by this record is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction. We have read the record and find the evidence sufficient. The affirmative charge was properly refused.

The judgment is affirmed.

Harris v. State
25 Ala. App. 636 140 So. 925

Case Details

Name
Harris v. State
Decision Date
Jan 19, 1932
Citations

25 Ala. App. 636

140 So. 925

Jurisdiction
Alabama

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!