Claim of Eisenberg v. Erie Railroad 240 A.D. 790

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., Crapser Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents, with a memorandum.

Rhodes, J.

(dissenting). I dissent. The claimant worked substantially the whole of the year preceding his injury, but was a five-day worker. The wage *791rate should, therefore, be computed in accordance with subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (See Matter of Remmert v. Weidenmeyer, 237 App. Div. 147; affd., 262 N. Y.-.)