Michael Lynn Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his petitions for a writ of mandamus as a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and dismissing Brown’s action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Ray, No. CA-05-657-7-JCT (WD.Va. Nov. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED