130 Ohio St. 334

The Cincinnati Goodwill Industries v. Neuerman.

(No. 25516

Decided December 26, 1935.)

Messrs. Lorbach £ Garver, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith £ Hoadly, Mr. Henry B. Street and Mr. Morris C. Bristol, for defendant in error.

It appears from the record that the trial court overruled motions of the defendant for a directed verdict, as well as' a motion for judgment contra verdict, and granted a motion for a new trial. Thereupon defendant prosecuted error to the Court of Appeals, which dismissed the petition in error and cross-petition in error for the reason that there was no judgment or final order in the Court of Common Pleas.

The Court of Appeals granted an order to certify the record on the ground of conflict with Toney v. Jenhins, 47 Ohio App., 248, 191 N. E., 828, and Union Gas & Electric Co. v. Hill, 49 Ohio App., 20, 194 N. E., 884.

*335On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of said Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for the reason that the action of the trial court in overruling the motions of defendant for a directed verdict and for judgment contra verdict and granting the motion for a new trial constituted a final order from which error may be prosecuted. Therefore the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction. Jacob Laub Baking Co. v. Middleton, 118 Ohio St., 106, 160 N. E., 629; Chris Boll Hardware Co. v. Logan Brick Supply Co., 84 Ohio St., 455, 95 N. E., 1144; Davis v. Turner, 69 Ohio St., 101, 68 N. E., 819.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Williams, J., dissents.

Cincinnati Goodwill Industries v. Neuerman
130 Ohio St. 334

Case Details

Name
Cincinnati Goodwill Industries v. Neuerman
Decision Date
Dec 26, 1935
Citations

130 Ohio St. 334

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!