United States v. Walker 459 F. App'x 582

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Kent Walker challenges the reasonableness of the sentence that the district court1 imposed upon revoking his supervised release. Having carefully reviewed the record, see United States v. Growden, 663 F.3d 982, 984 (8th Cir.2011), we conclude that the revocation sentence of 8 months in prison, which was within the advisory Guidelines range and below the statutory maximum, followed by 6 months of supervised release, which was also authorized by statute, was not unreasonable, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), (h); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.