32 Ga. App. 403

15423.

Rounsaville v. Lamb.

Decided June 10, 1924.

Action for damages; from Floyd superior court — Judge Wright. February 4, 1924.

Maddox, Matthews & Owens, for plaintiff in error.

Porter & Mehane, contra.

Bloodwobth, J.

1. When the excerpts from the charge of which complaint is made in the motion for a new trial are considered in connection with the remainder of the charge, there is no error in any of them that requires the grant of a new trial.

2. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jnry; no error of law appears to have been committed upon the trial of the case; and the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Rounsaville v. Lamb
32 Ga. App. 403

Case Details

Name
Rounsaville v. Lamb
Decision Date
Jun 10, 1924
Citations

32 Ga. App. 403

Jurisdiction
Georgia

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!