While Pierre Watson was serving a period of supervised release on a federal criminal sentence, he admitted to the district court1 that he had violated several release conditions. The court revoked supervised release and imposed a revocation sentence of 8 months in prison and 48 months of additional supervised release. On appeal, Watson contends that the court abused its discretion by failing to articulate its consideration of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review); United States v. Gray, 533 F.3d 942, 943-44 (8th Cir.2008). The judgment is affirmed.
596 F. App'x 526
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pierre WATSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-3265.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: March 12, 2015.
Filed: March 17, 2015.
*527Tracy Berry, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Saint Louis, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Emily Nyman Kaiser, Kaiser & Kaiser, PC, Saint Charles, MO, for Defendant-Appellant.
Pierre Watson, Forrest City, AR, pro se.
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Watson
596 F. App'x 526
Case Details
596 F. App'x 526
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!