Motion dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. (See Behren v. Papworth, 30 N Y 2d 532; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, ยง 21, pp. 92-93.)
36 N.Y.2d 689
Arthur Puro, Appellant, v. Louis Puro et al., Respondents.
Submitted January 27, 1975;
decided February 17, 1975.
*690Nathan Cooper for motion.
Edward N. Costikyan and Ambrose Doskow opposed.
Puro v. Puro
36 N.Y.2d 689
Case Details
36 N.Y.2d 689
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!