The appellant was complainant below. She said that the appellee had infringed claim 6 of letters patent No. 730.647, issued June 9, 1903, to Haynie and Halí. The learned judge below dismissed her bill. He held that, in view of the prior art, the combination described in the claim in question was without patentable novelty. We are of the same opinion. Affirmed.
193 F. 1020
HALL v. SWART.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
March 11, 1912.)
No. 1,082.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Frank S. Appleman (Arden Howell, on the brief), for appellant.
Frederick S. Stitt (R. S. & A. B. Lacey, on the brief), for appellee.
Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and DAYTON and ROSE, District Judges.
Hall v. Swart
193 F. 1020
Case Details
193 F. 1020
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!