Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ensermo Guerrero-Almanzar raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
222 F. App'x 377
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ensermo GUERRERO-ALMANZAR, true name Anselmo Guerrero-Almanza, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-40780
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 7, 2007.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Guerrero-Almanzar
222 F. App'x 377
Case Details
222 F. App'x 377
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!