12 Ohio Law Abs. 161

LEHMAN & CARPENTER v HUENE

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Lorain Co

No 598.

Decided May 27, 1932

Wm. D. Taylor, Elyria, and Anthony Nieding, Elyria, for plaintiffs in error.

Fauver & Fauver, Elyria, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM

It is settled by a long line of decisions in this state that the statute of frauds is remedial, although it is not contained in part third of the laws of Ohio, which is denominated “remedial.” During all the time when these decisions were made, the statute of frauds has been, as it is now, in part second of the laws of Ohio, which is denominated “civil.”

The statute of frauds being a remedial one, and the suit instituted by the plaintiffs not having been filed during the period when the law required contracts of this nature to be in writing, §26 GC does not have any application to the facts as shown by the pleadings in this case.

The judgment of the trial court in sustaining the demurrer is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings as provided by law.

PARDEE, PJ, WASHBURN and FUNK, JJ, concur.

Lehman & Carpenter v. Huene
12 Ohio Law Abs. 161

Case Details

Name
Lehman & Carpenter v. Huene
Decision Date
May 27, 1932
Citations

12 Ohio Law Abs. 161

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!