This appeal is taken from a directed verdict granted the respondent in an action brought for damage to an automobile while in respondent’s garage. The court below held that the appellant, who is the registered title owner of the automobile in question, was not the real party in interest. We find on the contrary that the appellant is a proper party to the action and that the court below was in error. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed.
276 S.C. 374 •
278 S.E.2d 779
21466
Dorothy H. WHITE, Appellant, v. Conrad SHEALY, d/b/a Shealy’s Auto Service, Respondent.
(278 S. E. (2d) 779)
*375 David Jackson Cooper, Jr., Columbia, for appellcmt.
W. Ray Berry of Berry & Berry, Columbia, for respondent.
May 27, 1981.
White v. Shealy
276 S.C. 374 •
278 S.E.2d 779
Case Details
276 S.C. 374
278 S.E.2d 779
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!