Charles Bausley appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming defendant jail personnel violated his constitutional rights by moving him to a different cell after a fight, without letting him present his version of the incident, and by seizing property from his cell. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 486, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995); Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 525-36, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
110 F. App'x 736
Charles BAUSLEY, Appellant, v. BENDER, Deputy; Ritter, Deputy, Appellees.
No. 04-2452.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 1, 2004.
Decided Oct. 13, 2004.
*737Charles Bausley, Little Rock, AR, pro se.
Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Bausley v. Bender
110 F. App'x 736
Case Details
110 F. App'x 736
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!