50 Or. App. 181 622 P.2d 756

Submitted on record and briefs December 12, 1980,

affirmed January 26, 1981

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. EDWARD AUGUSTINE La RODA, Appellant.

(No. CR 79-0449, CA 18797)

622 P2d 756

Frank J. Susak, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.

Virginia L. Linder, Assistant Attorney General, James M. Brown, Attorney General, John R. McCulloch, Jr., Solicitor General, and William F. Gary, Deputy Solicitor General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*182PER CURIAM

Defendant urges that the trial court abused its discretion in accepting his plea of guilty, because, he says, the record demonstrates that the plea was not voluntarily entered. The contention is not within the scope of review on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a guilty plea. ORS 135.050. If the trial court committed error, it was constitutional error and the remedy lies in a post-conviction proceeding. See generally, State v. Jairl, 229 Or 533, 541-42, 368 P2d 323 (1962); State v. Slopak, 3 Or App 532, 475 P2d 421 (1970).

Affirmed.

State v. La Roda
50 Or. App. 181 622 P.2d 756

Case Details

Name
State v. La Roda
Decision Date
Jan 26, 1981
Citations

50 Or. App. 181

622 P.2d 756

Jurisdiction
Oregon

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!