We have decided to certify tho question involved to the Supreme Court. We were informed at the argument that a cause is pending in that court involving the same question. In view of the importance of the question, we think the Supreme Court should have the benefit of the argument of counsel against, as well as in favor of, the contention of the petitioner. As this is an ex parte proceeding, we suggest that application be made to the Supreme Court for a rule setting the case for hearing with the other case above referred to. Counsel may submit statement of proposed question.
162 F. 1007
In re MADSON STEELE CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 15, 1908.)
No. 271.
Petition to Review Order of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Abram I. Elkus, for petitioner.
Win. B. Hornblower, amicus curiae.
Before COXE, WARD, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.
In re Madson Steele Co.
162 F. 1007
Case Details
162 F. 1007
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!