88 A.D.3d 586 931 N.Y.S.2d 495

In the Matter of Roxanne R., Appellant, v Luis A.F., Respondent, and Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[931 NYS2d 495]

Family Court properly determined that freeing the child for *587adoption by her foster parents was in her best interests (see Matter of Guinta v Doxtator, 20 AD3d 47, 53-55 [2005]). The standard for custody as between nonparents does not afford appellant a preference (Matter of Vanisha J. [Patricia J.], 87 AD3d 696 [2011]; Matter of Jennifer A., 225 AD2d 204, 206 [1996], lv denied 91 NY2d 809 [1998]). Nevertheless, we note that appellant is free to seek visitation (see Matter of Shelia B. v Shirelle Jasmine B., 67 AD3d 610 [2009]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Roxanne R. v. Luis A.F.
88 A.D.3d 586 931 N.Y.S.2d 495

Case Details

Name
Roxanne R. v. Luis A.F.
Decision Date
Oct 25, 2011
Citations

88 A.D.3d 586

931 N.Y.S.2d 495

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!