Fleming v. Romero 345 So. 2d 50

In re: Arthur H. Fleming applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 342 So.2d 881, Third Circuit Parish of Iberia.

Application denied; the result is correct.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., are of the opinion that a writ should be granted.

TATE, J.,

dissents from the denial of the

writ: I am of the opinion that the defendant’s agreement to sell was timely accepted in writing by the plaintiff’s attorney (as well as the defendant’s acceptance of a deposit), for the reasons stated by the trial court.