163 F. App'x 510

James H. SANDERS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. G.E. TRAMMEL, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-15463.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*511Submitted Jan. 9, 2006.*

Decided Jan. 17, 2006.

Before: HUG, O’SCANNLAIN and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

James H. Sanders appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal from a judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Sanders’s motion for an extension of time for filing a notice of appeal was filed almost three years after his petition was dismissed. The district court had no discretion to grant Sanders’s motion because it was not filed within 180 days after judgment was entered. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6); In re Stein, 197 F.3d 421, 426 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

Sanders v. Trammel
163 F. App'x 510

Case Details

Name
Sanders v. Trammel
Decision Date
Jan 17, 2006
Citations

163 F. App'x 510

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!