449 So. 2d 292

FINST DEV., INC., Appellant, v. Isaac BEMAOR, Sergio Goldemberg, David Saul, Vulf Mintz, Luba Mintz and Zelman Mintz, Appellees.

Nos. 83-619, 83-1714.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 6, 1984.

Rehearing Denied April 13, 1984.

See also, Fla.App., 449 So.2d 290.

Richard M. Gale, Stabinski & Funt, Miami, for appellant.

Fuller & Feingold and John Fuller, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment rescinding certain contracts for the sale of condominium units, returning the deposits thereon to the plaintiff/buyers, and awarding attorney’s fees for the plaintiff/buyers. The material facts of this case, although complex, are undisputed on this record. We conclude that based on these facts the contracts herein were properly rescinded as a matter of law for failure of the defendant/seller to comply substantially with certain provisions of the Florida Condominium Act, §§ 718.202, 718.-503, 718.504, Fla.Stat. (1981), and the Federal Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. (1982); see Dorchester Development, Inc. v. Burk, *293439 So.2d 1032 (Fla.3d DCA 1983). We also agree that as a matter of law the counterclaim herein has no merit based on this record. Finally, we conclude that the attorney’s fees awarded below were reasonable and authorized by Section 718.-506(2), Florida Statutes (1981). See Pfohl v. Pfohl, 345 So.2d 371, 379 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). We accordingly affirm in all respects the final summary judgment under review.

Affirmed.

Finst Dev., Inc. v. Bemaor
449 So. 2d 292

Case Details

Name
Finst Dev., Inc. v. Bemaor
Decision Date
Mar 6, 1984
Citations

449 So. 2d 292

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!