106 A.D.3d 1020 965 N.Y.S.2d 356

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Matista, Appellant.

[965 NYS2d 356]

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Aloise, J.), imposed February 24, 2009, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, J.P., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Hall, JJ., concur.

People v. Matista
106 A.D.3d 1020 965 N.Y.S.2d 356

Case Details

Name
People v. Matista
Decision Date
May 22, 2013
Citations

106 A.D.3d 1020

965 N.Y.S.2d 356

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!