Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Collin, Cuddebaok, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ.
Miles v. Stallo, 168 Ápp. Div. 905, affirmed.
(Argued December 6, 1916;
decided December 28, 1916.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 16, 1915, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action upon a promissory note alleged to have been executed by defendant Stallo in his own name and also as attorney in fact for Alexander McDonald, since deceased. The defenses were failure of consideration and lack of power on the part of Stallo to sign the note for McDonald.
Nash Rockwood for appellants.
Edwin Mn Otterbourg^ Charles A. Houston and Edward B. Levy for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Collin, Cuddebaok, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ.
219 N.Y. 669
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!