Blackburn v. Dudley 303 S.C. 169, 399 S.E.2d 592

303 S.C. 169 • 399 S.E.2d 592

BLACKBURN AND COMPANY, INC., Petitioner v. William G. DUDLEY, III and KTM Broadcasting Company, Inc., Respondents.

(399 S.E. (2d) 592)

Supreme Court

Arnold S. Goodstein and Mary Ann Marwick, both of Good-stein and Goodstein, Summerville, for petitioner.

Mark H. Wall, of Robinson, Craver, Wall and Hastie, Charleston, for respondents.

Oct. 29, 1990.

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Due to inconsistencies between the record and statements by the attorneys as to the verdict returned and the resulting consequences, it is the opinion of this Court that justice requires the vacating of the trial of this matter in the circuit court and of the opinion of the Court of Appeals found at Blackburn & Co., Inc. v. Dudley, 298 S.C. 538, 381 S.E. (2d) 918 (Ct. App. 1989). We remand the matter to the circuit court for a new trial de novo with the right for all parties to amend their pleadings. The case shall be restored to a place of priority on the trial roster.

It is so ordered.

Blackburn v. Dudley
303 S.C. 169 • 399 S.E.2d 592

Case Details

Name
Blackburn v. Dudley
Decision Date
Oct 29, 1990
Citations

303 S.C. 169

399 S.E.2d 592

Jurisdiction
South Carolina
Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!