201 A.D.2d 637 609 N.Y.S.2d 831

Linda Rogoff, Respondent, v Two Grace Court Associates et al., Appellants.

[609 NYS2d 831]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated July 16, 1991, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to restore the matter to the trial calendar, treating it as a motion to vacate the dismissal of the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff’s motion (see generally, Sheehan v Hollywood, 112 AD2d 211). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Rogoff v. Two Grace Court Associates
201 A.D.2d 637 609 N.Y.S.2d 831

Case Details

Name
Rogoff v. Two Grace Court Associates
Decision Date
Feb 22, 1994
Citations

201 A.D.2d 637

609 N.Y.S.2d 831

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!