Thomas Wooldridge, appointed counsel for Angel Resendiz in this direct criminal *868appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Resendiz’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
459 F. App'x 867
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel Ruben RESENDIZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-13257
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 2, 2012.
Ryan Scott Ferber, Laurel R. Boatright, Lawrence R. Sommerfeld, Sally Yates, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Thomas C. Wooldridge, Wooldridge & Jezek, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Angel Ruben Resendiz, Folkston, GA, pro se.
Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Resendiz
459 F. App'x 867
Case Details
459 F. App'x 867
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!