39 Cust. Ct. 388

No. 61104.

protests 584775-G, etc. (New York).

Draeger Shipping Co. and J. Citroen et al. v. United States,

*389Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “K” consist of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and the items marked “L” of lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, supra.

Draeger Shipping Co. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 388

Case Details

Name
Draeger Shipping Co. v. United States
Decision Date
Jul 31, 1957
Citations

39 Cust. Ct. 388

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!