20 Ala. App. 694 103 So. 926

(103 So. 926)

RUSS v. STATE.

(3 Div. 477.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 17, 1925.)

P. E. Alexander, of Prattville, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMPORD, J.

There was sufficient evidence to submit this case to the jury, but no evidence as to venue. The affirmative charge was asked for defendant, but the fact that it was asked on account of a failure of proof as to venue was not brought to the attention of the trial court. This is not now an. open question in Alabama. Ray v. State, 16 Ala. App. 496, 79 So. 620; Watts v. State, 204 Ala. 372, 86 So. 70; Fondren v. State, 204 Ala. 451, 86 So. 71; Reaves v. State, 18 Ala. App. 5, 87 So. 705. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Russ v. State
20 Ala. App. 694 103 So. 926

Case Details

Name
Russ v. State
Decision Date
Feb 17, 1925
Citations

20 Ala. App. 694

103 So. 926

Jurisdiction
Alabama

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!