397 S.W.3d 538

Antwone D. IRVING, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 98889.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 16, 2013.

Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for Mov-ant/Appellant.

Andrew C. Hooper, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antwone D. Irving appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons *539for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Irving v. State
397 S.W.3d 538

Case Details

Name
Irving v. State
Decision Date
Apr 16, 2013
Citations

397 S.W.3d 538

Jurisdiction
Missouri

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!