36 Cal. App. 815

[Civ. No. 2123.

First Appellate District.

February 18, 1918.]

CHARLES H. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Respondents.

Municipal Corporations—Dismissal op Police Officers—San Francisco Charter.—Judgment affirmed on the authority of MaePhee v. Board of Police Commissioners of the City and County of San Francisco et al., ante, p. 308.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Franklin A. Griffin, Judge.

The facts are identical with those stated in the opinion in the case of MacPhee v. Board of Police Commissioners of the City and County of San Frmcisco et al., ante, p. 308.

Nathan C. Coghlan, E. V. McKenzie, and A. L. O’Grady, for Appellant.

Geo. Lull, City Attorney, and Maurice T. Dooling, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Respondents.

BEASLY, J., pro tem.

This ease is identical in all respects with that of MacPhee v. Board of Police Commissioners et al., ante, p. 308, [171 Pac. 1086], and upon the authority of that ease the judgment herein is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

Taylor v. Board of Police Commissioners
36 Cal. App. 815

Case Details

Name
Taylor v. Board of Police Commissioners
Decision Date
Feb 18, 1918
Citations

36 Cal. App. 815

Jurisdiction
California

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!