284 A.D.2d 372 725 N.Y.S.2d 893

Theresa M. Grabowski et al., Appellants, v Arlene M. Goldberg, Respondent.

[725 NYS2d 893]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), dated August 25, 2000, as, upon granting their motion for renewal and reargument, adhered to its original determination, in an order dated May 15, 2000, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Theresa M. Grabowski did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The only medical evidence submitted in support of the plaintiffs’ motion for renewal and reargument, an affirmed report of an orthodontist, Edward A. Myers, failed to provide objective evidence of the extent or degree of the injured plaintiffs alleged limitation (see, Grossman v Wright, 268 AD2d 79; Beckett v Conte, 176 AD2d 774).

*373The plaintiffs’ remaining contention is without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Grabowski v. Goldberg
284 A.D.2d 372 725 N.Y.S.2d 893

Case Details

Name
Grabowski v. Goldberg
Decision Date
Jun 11, 2001
Citations

284 A.D.2d 372

725 N.Y.S.2d 893

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!