This appeal is from a June 23,1994, “order setting aside and elarifying/modifying custody and support provisions of amended agreed final judgment of paternity and support dated May 2, 1994.” That order followed a hearing on the appellee’s objection to and motion to set aside the May 2 judgment.
The trial court properly found that the May 2 judgment was not valid. It then modified the provisions in the May 2 judgment regarding custody, visitation, and child support. The Appellant argues that this modification was error because there was no petition to do so, no notice that it would be done, and no showing of a substantial change in circumstances warranting modification. We agree. See e.g., Leibowitz v. Leibowitz, 611 So.2d 629 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
Before the May 2 judgment, the trial court had entered an agreed amended final judgment dated March 12, to which appellant had objected. Because the May 2 judgment was correctly set aside, we remand for further proceedings to resolve the objections to the March 12 judgment.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
GLICKSTEIN, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.