232 A.D. 682

In the Matter of the Application of Antonio De Falco, Respondent, against William E. Walsh and Others, etc., Defendants. Joseph Zorn, Intervening *683Defendant, Appellant.*

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Motion for reargument denied. It should be understood that the affirmance is intended to be without prejudice to an application to the board of standards and appeals for a variance if so advised. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

De Falco v. Walsh
232 A.D. 682

Case Details

Name
De Falco v. Walsh
Decision Date
Jan 1, 1931
Citations

232 A.D. 682

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!