73 Ohio St. 3d 292

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo.

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 292.]

*293(No. 94-2645

Submitted April 24, 1995

Decided August 23, 1995.)

*294Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Chukwujindu Victor Mbakpuo, pro se.

*295 Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s finding that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 2-102(A)(4) and (C); 2-106(A); 3 — 101(B); 6-101(A)(3); and 7-101(A)(3); and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). We further concur in the recommended sanction. Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law in Ohio indefinitely. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Resnick, J., dissents and would disbar respondent.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo
73 Ohio St. 3d 292

Case Details

Name
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo
Decision Date
Aug 23, 1995
Citations

73 Ohio St. 3d 292

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!