44 F. App'x 864

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jorge RAMIREZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-50033.

D.C. No. CR-01-02523-NAJ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2000.*

Decided Aug. 19, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Jorge Ramirez appeals his conviction by guilty plea for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Ramirez’s argument that his convictions should be reversed because 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 are unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by United States v. Varela-Rivera, 279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002) (section 952) and United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104, 1109-11 (9th Cir. 2002) (section 960).

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Ramirez
44 F. App'x 864

Case Details

Name
United States v. Ramirez
Decision Date
Aug 19, 2002
Citations

44 F. App'x 864

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!