90 Nev. 416 529 P.2d 208

MAX MORTON GOLDEN, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 7761

December 20, 1974

529 P.2d 208

Legarza, Lee, Barengo & Doyle, of Reno, for Appellant.

Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; Robert E. Rose, District Attorney, Larry R. Hicks, and Michael E. Mal-loy, Deputy District Attorneys, Washoe County, for Respondent.

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented to the grand jury justified its indictment of appellant. NRS 172.155; Callanan v. United States, 364 U.S. 587 (1961); McWilliams v. State, 87 Nev. 302, 486 P.2d 481 (1971).

“[W]e are not now concerned with the prospect that the *417evidence presently in the record may, by itself, be insufficient to sustain a conviction.” McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 327, 512 P.2d 774, 775 (1973).

Other contentions raised by appellant are without merit. Cf. Baker v. State, 88 Nev. 369, 498 P.2d 1310 (1972).

The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.

Golden v. Sheriff
90 Nev. 416 529 P.2d 208

Case Details

Name
Golden v. Sheriff
Decision Date
Dec 20, 1974
Citations

90 Nev. 416

529 P.2d 208

Jurisdiction
Nevada

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!