Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and having heard oral argument by counsel, we can find no abuse of discretion,1 particularly in view of the “Savings to Suitors” clause of 28 U.S.C. § 1333(1)2 and the familiarity of the Florida courts with maritime disputes. See, e.g. Carnival Corp. v. Carlisle, 953 So.2d 461 (Fla.2007). Therefore, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
294 F. App'x 501
GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE (UK) PLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven POMARICO, Dennis Dodson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-15066.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Sept. 23, 2008.
Jonathan W. Skipp, Stephanie H. Wylie, Horr, Novak & Skipp, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Michael Ramer Karcher, Karcher Canning & Karcher, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before BIRCH and MARCUS, Circuit Judges and FORRESTER,* District Judge.
Great Lakes Reinsurance PLC v. Pomarico
294 F. App'x 501
Case Details
294 F. App'x 501
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!