179 A.D.2d 1069

Timothy Moors et al., Respondents, v Travelers Insurance Company, Appellant.

Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that Supreme Court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, CPLR 3211 [c]; 3212; see also, Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Gold-stein v County of Monroe, 77 AD2d 232). Plaintiff’s affidavit was sufficient to raise a factual issue concerning whether defendant had assumed a duty to him to instruct him properly and whether the alleged breach of that duty left plaintiff in a more vulnerable position than he otherwise would have been in, thereby contributing to his injury (cf., Jansen v Fidelity & Cas. Co., 165 AD2d 223, lv granted 78 NY2d 853; Kingsland v Factory Mut. Sys., 145 AD2d 965, lv dismissed 74 NY2d 841). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Affronti, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Callahan, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Moors v. Travelers Insurance
179 A.D.2d 1069

Case Details

Name
Moors v. Travelers Insurance
Decision Date
Jan 31, 1992
Citations

179 A.D.2d 1069

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!