146 F. App'x 919

Oscar Munoz SIGALA; Rubina Oropeza De Munoz, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-70067.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.*

Decided Oct. 25, 2005.

Kevin M. Knebel, Law Offices of Kevin M. Knebel, Monrovia, CA, for Petitioners.

*920CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Attorney, Ernesto H, Molina, Jr., Margaret K. Taylor, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: HALL, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

Oscar Munoz Sígala and Rubina Oropeza De Munoz, married natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider the Petitioners’ challenge to the IJ’s extreme hardship determination because it is a discretionary, nonreviewable determination. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)).

The Petitioners’ contention that the BIA’s streamlining procedures violate due process is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 850-51 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.

Sigala v. Gonzales
146 F. App'x 919

Case Details

Name
Sigala v. Gonzales
Decision Date
Oct 25, 2005
Citations

146 F. App'x 919

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!