Daniel R. Baird appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his civil action. Upon de novo review, see Meyer v. City of Joplin, 281 F.3d 759, 760 (per curiam) (8th Cir.2002), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
381 F. App'x 628
Daniel R. BAIRD, Appellant, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE; Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers Teamsters Division 202, Appel-lees.
No. 09-3787.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: June 4, 2010.
Filed: June 21, 2010.
Daniel R. Baird, Dilworth, MN, pro se. Diane Gerth, Spence & Ricke, St. Paul, MN, for Burlington Northern Santa Fe.
Richard Allen Williams, Jr., Williams & Iversen, Roseville, MN, for Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers Teamsters Division 202.
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Baird v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe
381 F. App'x 628
Case Details
381 F. App'x 628
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!