657 So. 2d 1159

John RUSSO, Petitioner, v. SERA-TEC BIOLOGICALS, INC., Respondent.

No. 85012.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 20, 1995.

Richard T. Kozek, Jr., Miami, for petitioner.

Shelley H. Leinieke of Wicker, Smith, Tu-tan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham, Lane & Ford, P.A, Ft. Lauderdale, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We review Russo v. Sera-Tec Biologicals, Inc., 650 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), in which the court affirmed on the basis of R.J. v. Humana of Florida, Inc., 625 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). We accepted jurisdiction because the Humana case was pending before this Court. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). We have now decided the Humana case. R.J. v. Humana of Florida, Inc., 652 So.2d 360 (Fla.1995). Accordingly, we remand this case for disposition consistent with Humana.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Russo v. Sera-Tec Biologicals Inc.
657 So. 2d 1159

Case Details

Name
Russo v. Sera-Tec Biologicals Inc.
Decision Date
Jul 20, 1995
Citations

657 So. 2d 1159

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!