314 F. App'x 622

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony Dale NORRIS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-8583.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 20, 2009.

Decided: March 5, 2009.

Anthony Dale Norris, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

*623Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Dale Norris appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Norris, No. 6:05-cr-01163-HMH-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Norris
314 F. App'x 622

Case Details

Name
United States v. Norris
Decision Date
Mar 5, 2009
Citations

314 F. App'x 622

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!