St. John was one of the defendants in the government’s prosecution of Haywood and others. He sued out a separate writ of error. For the reasons given in Haywood v. United States (C. C. A.) 268 Fed. 795, herewith decided, the judgment against St. John is modified, by striking therefrom the imprisonments and fines under counts 1 and 2, and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
268 F. 808
ST. JOHN v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
October 5, 1920.
Rebearing Denied December 9, 1920.)
No. 2695.
In Error to tbe District Court of tbe United States, for tbe Eastern Division of tbe Northern District of Illinois.
Vincent St. John was convicted on an indictment containing four counts charging conspiracy, and he brings error.
Judgment modified, by striking therefrom tbe imprisonments and fines under counts 1 and 2, and, as modified, affirmed.
Clarence Darrow, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff in error.
Charles F. Clyne and Joseph B. Fleming, both of Chicago, Ill., for the United States.
Before BAKER, ALSCHULER, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.
St. John v. United States
268 F. 808
Case Details
268 F. 808
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!