130 Misc. 394

Sam Zimmerman, Appellant, v. Joe Rubin and Another, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 29, 1927.

Phillips, Jaffe & Jaffe [Moses Jaffe of counsel], for the appellant.

Shattuck, Bangs & Winant [George B. Francis of counsel], for the respondents.

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover broker’s commissions on the sale of a store. The broker, who is the plaintiff, appellant, brought the parties together, and the purchaser agreed to the seller’s terms. Because of two misrepresentations made by the seller, the purchaser has been allowed to recover back the deposit which he made. The plaintiff, appellant, was not responsible for the non-completion of the transaction. Having brought a customer who was able, ready and willing to purchase on the seller s terms, he has earned and is entitled to the commission for which he sued.

Judgment reversed, with $30 costs to appellant, and judgment directed for plaintiff for $650 and costs.

All concur; present, Bi,tur, Levy and Crain, JJ.

Zimmerman v. Rubin
130 Misc. 394

Case Details

Name
Zimmerman v. Rubin
Decision Date
Jun 29, 1927
Citations

130 Misc. 394

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!