Wisconsin Granite Co. v. Industrial Commission 208 Wis. 282

208 Wis. 282

Wisconsin Granite Company, Respondent, vs. Industrial Commission and another as administratrix, Appellants.

December 11, 1931

June 20, 1932.

For the appellants there were briefs by Grotophorst, Quale & Langer of Baraboo, attorneys for Matilda Swaf-ford individually and as administratrix, and the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general, attorneys for the Industrial Commission, and oral argument by Mr. Langer and Mr. Levitan.

For the respondent there were briefs by Richmond, Jack-man, Wilkie & Toebaas of Madison and Lowell A. Lawson of Chicago, Illinois, and oral argument by F. Halsey Kraege of Madison and Harold M. Wilkie.

The following opinion was filed April 5, 1932 :

Owen, J.

This is a companion case of Wisconsin Granite Company, a corporation, respondent, v. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin and Matilda Swafford, appellants, decided herewith (ante, p. 270, 242 N. W. 191). All of the *283questions presented in this case .were considered and decided in that, and the disposition of this case must be the same.

By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with instructions to enter judgment remanding the case to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings as indicated in the opinion in Wisconsin Granite Co. v. Industrial Commission and Matilda Swafford.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on June 20, 1932.

Wisconsin Granite Co. v. Industrial Commission

208 Wis. 282

Case Details

Name

Wisconsin Granite Co. v. Industrial Commission

Decision Date

Jun 20, 1932

Citations

208 Wis. 282

Jurisdiction

Wisconsin

Court

Wisconsin Supreme Court

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!