Having carefully considered the propositions of the parties and their counsel, and the opinion of the learned judge who heard this case in the Circuit Court, we are satisfied with his conclusions and the reasons given by him therefor. The decree of the Circuit Court (190 Fed, 155) is affirmed, with costs of appeal to the appellees.
194 F. 1023
WORCESTER GASLIGHT CO. v. COMBUSTION UTILITIES CORPORATION et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
April 26, 1912.)
No. 948.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
John H. Roney, of Pittsburgh (William A. Copeland and Macleod, Calver, Copeland & Dike, on the brief), for appellant.
Harold Binney, of New York City (Odin Roberts, Roberts & Cushman, and Binney & Mastick, on the brief), for appellees.
Before COLT and PUTNAM, Circuit Judges, and ALDRICH. District Judge.
Worcester Gaslight Co. v. Combustion Utilities Corp.
194 F. 1023
Case Details
194 F. 1023
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!