105 Fla. 656 142 So. 221

R. H. Chapman and wife, Edith Chapman, Appellants, vs. A. R. Nason, Appellee.

142 So. 221.

Division B.

Decision filed June 8, 1932.

Cone Chapman, for Appellants;

Evans & Glenn, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Chapman v. Nason
105 Fla. 656 142 So. 221

Case Details

Name
Chapman v. Nason
Decision Date
Jun 8, 1932
Citations

105 Fla. 656

142 So. 221

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!